Intervention of Stroop Effect on Color Naming Task

Intervention of Stroop number on burnish appellation TaskDang Su ReneAbstractThe question shows that the intervention of Stroop takings affects the magazine interpreted in completing the alter assigning labor. To do this experiment, 248 participants were randomly selected which atomic number 18 half of the participants atomic number 18 Chinese speech production and some other half atomic number 18 non-Chinese oratory. The two type of participants get out took this experiment. Their result were recorded and shows that non-Chinese discourse took a little long-run time to secern the dis colouring of round shapes, deaf(p) rowing, incongruent color devises and related haggle compared to Chinese speaking. However, their results bite out to be very competitive. In contrast, participants who are Chinese speaking they visit Chinese incongruent word and this causes them take time to recognise it.(115 words)IntroductionStroop effect is discovered by John Ridley Stro op was first tell in 1935 in an article. This effect is a study of an intervention that the superstars reaction time of a task. However, the misapply of interference or inhibition has given the physiologist to begin the investigation on experimental literary works and has perpetuate to the present by psychologists. Many studies had been published but precisely several reports captured the psychologist attention.Stroop (1935) was the original Stroop Experiment that studied the move in identification the ink color and the nature of stimulus which is round shape versus incongruent color words. It illustrates the nature of self-locking licking versus visual awareness control. The results showed that the revive in naming the ink color of incongruent color words were slower compared to round shapes. The conclusion was stated were due to interference effect. later a short time, there is two alternative explanation for the Stroop Effect have been suggested which is relative speed of processing argument and automaticity account.The relative speed of argument theory was seed by John Morton (1969). Both teaching and color naming are accomplished in parallel. When it is complete at the aforementioned(prenominal) time, word reading is unbendableer and therefore interferes with color naming in the black market for communicatory output.Schiffrin and Schneider (1977) came up automaticity account theory that suggested the two cognitive attentional processes are automatic processes and controlled processes. They illustrate the differences in the midst of the automatic and the controlled. automated task requires less attention, difficult to interrupt and it is a task that we are practiced at. In contrast, controlled task requires more(prenominal) attention, interrupt easily and brisk tasks is given. Therefore, the Stroop Effect happens when an automatic process disrupts a controlled process and this may causes changes later on practicing at naming colors.Dal rymple-Alford (1972) considered the variation of the Stroop Effect which includes some conditions. The conditions was to have shapes, color related words and non color-related words. As a result, he concluded that more interference for color related word.Ami (2012) studied that conventional theories of the Stroop effect propose that high-speed color categorization on congruent trials parallel to incongruent trials is ca utilise by channel interaction. In other words, information from the unrelated word channel disrupts processing of the print color, in turn triggers the deceleration process of incongruent displays.Karthikeyan, Murugappan, Yaacob (2014) studied the results shows that notable changes between the normal and stressed states are more apparent with categorization accuracy.The aim is to display the interference in the response time of a task. Therefore, the current research helps us project that the participants allow take durable time to lay color for incongruent co lor words ( piece of paper C) compared to color shapes (Sheet A) and color apathetic words (Sheet B). Participants who are Chinese speaking will take longer time to identify color for Chinese-incongruent color words (Sheet E) compared to those non-Chinese speaking. Participants will take longer time to identify color for color related words (Sheet D) compared to color neutral words (Sheet B).(505 words)MethodParticipants248 participants were randomly selected from college mates, relatives, friends and acquaintances that were recruited by the researcher. The participants are aged between 16-50 years old. In addition, half of the participants are Chinese speaking and another half are non-Chinese speaking. The participants should not be color blind and moldiness be literate in English.MaterialsConstruct 5 test canvas tents and a practice sheet of A4 paper. cloak pencils or color markers are to be used for the 5 test sheets and practice sheet. A timer is used to record the duration o f the experiment.ProcedureBefore the experiment starts, the researcher has elect a suitable location where the participants can be seated with token(prenominal) distractions. Participants are also given a consent form to sign. each(prenominal) consent form contains the participants signature and the date they did the experiment.Next, the book of instructions and the experimental conditions were explained to the participants by the researcher. The 5 pages of test sheet with objects or words that are written in different colors were not shown to the participants. The participants were call for to name aloud the color of the objects or words as fast as they can. However, if the participants named it wrongly, they are alerted by the researcher and required to repeat the color of the object or word again.After that, the researcher showed the participants the practice sheet that consist one example from the 5 test sheets to make authoritative that they understand the instructions. Ot herwise, the researcher will repeat the explanation to them until they get to understand it. Then, show them the 5 test sheets which are Sheet A, B, C, D and E one at a time. Meanwhile, the time that the participants took to complete the task was tabulated by the researcher.(295 words)ResultsAccording to the experiments, most of the participants who are Chinese speaking react faster than the participants who are non-Chinese speaking. The table below is regarding to complete color naming task which is sheet A,B,C,D and E are round shape, color neutral words, incongruent color words, color-related words and Chinese incongruent color words.Table 1 show that the participants who are Chinese speaking take a longer time to finish test sheet E which is Chinese incongruent color words than those who are non-Chinese speaking. In contrast, the participants who are Chinese speaking spent significantly less time on the color naming task than the participants who are non-Chinese speaking. Overal l, my hypothesis was that the participants will take longer to identify Sheet C compared to Sheet A and B. Chinese speaking participants will spent longer time to identify Sheet E compared to those non-Chinese speaking. Participants will take longer time to identify Sheet D compared to Sheet B. My results do support my hypotheses.Table 1. Time Taken (In Seconds) to Complete Color Naming TaskFigure 1. Time taken (In Seconds) to Complete Color Naming Task(163words)DiscussionThe result showed a significant effect of the participants in completing color naming task were found in this study that the participants who are Chinese speaking take a longer time to finish test sheet E which is Chinese incongruent color words than those who are non-Chinese speaking. In contrast, the participants who are Chinese speaking spent significantly less time on the color naming task than the participants who are non-Chinese speaking.This result is in line with previous research and it supports my hypothe ses of this study. In the late(prenominal) research they do not have Chinese incongruent color words and the participants who are Chinese speaking. According to the past research, the findings of Stroop (1935) studied that the speed in naming ink color are affected by nature of stimulus. Morton (1969) also concluded that word reading is faster and therefore interferes with color naming in the race for verbal output. Dalrymple-Alford concluded that the results are more interference for color related words.ReferencesDalrymple-Alford,E.C. (1972). sanitary similarity and color word interference in the strooptask. Psychonomic Science, 28, 209-210.Ami, E. (2012), Independent race of color and word can predict the stroop effect. AustralianJournal Of Psychology, 64 , 189-198.Karthikeyan, P. , Murugappan, M. Yaacob, S. (2014). Analysis of Stroop Color Word Test-Based Human StressDetection using Electro circulariography ad Heart Rate Variability Signals. Arabian Journal for Science plan (Springer Science Buisness Media B.V.), 39, 1835-1847Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 329-346.Shiffrin, R.M. Schneider, W. (1977). Controled and automatic human processing II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychology Review, 84, 127-190.Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies in interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.